Man in Nepal fills water jug from outdoor tap.
Better availability of water for home use is one of the ways the village of Kailas has benefited from conservation of uphill forests.

Using Cost-benefit Analysis to Identify Ecosystem-based Solutions to Climate Change Challenges

By Mark Higgins

Ecosystems are fundamental to life on earth and provide goods and services that are essential to human well-being. This includes their role in helping human populations mitigate and adapt to climate change. Natural ecosystems reduce global carbon dioxide concentrations through carbon capture and storage, and diminish the impacts of climate change through protection from extreme weather. Cost-benefit analysis is a valuable tool for estimating the value of these services, designing USAID programs that leverage them, and comparing them to conventional solutions. These analyses can then be used to support investments in biodiversity conservation or restoration approaches that use ecosystem services to realize climate adaptation and mitigation goals.

As an example, a recent report from USAID’s CEADIR project compared the costs and benefits of traditional and “green” approaches to climate change adaptation. As part of its climate change adaptation programming, USAID/Mozambique conducted a cost-benefit analysis of an earthen dike and mangrove restoration as two means of reducing storm damage to coastal communities. Although the costs of both approaches outweighed their benefits when considering only storm damage reduction, the benefits of mangrove restoration were far greater than its costs when the additional services of carbon sequestration and fish spawning habitat were considered. Analyses such as these are powerful tools for supporting investments in ecosystem-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation.

In addition, USAID’s Office of Economic Policy and Office of Forestry and Biodiversity recently developed recommendations for incorporating ecosystems valuation into cost-benefit analysis as part of the USAID BRIDGE project. These recommendations include a step-by-step guide for USAID and practitioners, plus useful background information including key concepts, data sources and examples. Through these recommendations, USAID staff and others can help ensure ecosystem service values are taken into account during the design and implementation of development programs across sectors.

For more information, email Jenny Kane at FAB (jkane[at]usaid[dot]gov) or Paul Oliver at EP (poliver[at]usaid[dot]gov).

USAID’s Offices of Forestry and Biodiversity and Economic Policy presented this work on Thursday, February 28 as part of the National Ecosystem Services Partnership webinar series, and a recording of the event is available to the public.

Adaptation, Ecosystem-based Adaptation, Biodiversity, Carbon, Climate Finance, Coastal, Forestry, Sustainable Landscapes

Mark Higgins

Mark Higgins is a principle development specialist with the BRIDGE project, designed by the USAID Office of Forestry and Biodiversity to promote biodiversity integration throughout the USAID portfolio. He manages a suite of tools to support USAID’s Washington office and field staff in their design and implementation of integrated biodiversity programming. Mark has also worked for USAID’s LAC Bureau Environment Team and Geocenter, as well as USAID’s Measuring Impact project. Prior to his work with USAID, Mark was a doctoral and postdoctoral fellow at Duke University and the Carnegie Institution of Science, Stanford, mapping biodiversity and biomass in Central and South America from a combination of satellite, aerial and field data.

More on the Blog

In the dairy sector, low-emissions development (LED) often utilizes intensification practices that reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and increase yield. However, LED focuses on technical practices and outcomes, seldom considering the subsequent impacts on women’s and men's social distribution of burdens and benefits.
3 ways USAID helps El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change
Across the globe, people are struggling to improve air quality, but the sources of pollution that cause the most harm are a moving target. They can differ by location, time of year, and time of day.