AgResults’ prize competition in Vietnam helps rice farmers in Thai Binh province adopt climate-smart technology packages that increase productivity while reducing GHG emissions.

Why Prize Competitions Are a Viable Model for Scaling Climate-Smart Technologies

By Justin Kosoris headshot

“No pilots fail, but no pilots scale.”

Dr. Bruce Campbell, director of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food Security, lamented this on the first morning of the 5th Global Science Conference on Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA). This was a common refrain at the conference: Many technologies and practices are effective on a small scale, but have limited widespread uptake.

How can we overcome this struggle and scale crucial climate-smart technologies and practices? As we showed at the CSA conference, AgResults’ prize competition model that leverages private sector innovation and investment offers a solution. By engaging the private sector to scale up climate-smart technologies, we can mitigate emissions and prepare smallholder farmers for a changing climate. AgResults’ work in Vietnam shows how a prize competition creates a potential roadmap for scale using three steps: 1) short-term incentives, 2) potential for replicability, and 3) carbon market creation.

Short-term incentives. The Vietnam prize competition’s objective of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is leading to near-term economic benefits beyond the prizes. GHG emissions are not easily measured or monetized, but the competition is incentivizing behavior changes that could have tangible economic impacts for farmers and competitors. For smallholder farmers, practices that reduce on-farm GHG emissions may increase yields and reduce input and labor costs. For companies, incorporating these technologies into their business models boosts the likelihood that the Vietnamese government will recognize production practices that could create a possible market share for a “clean” rice product. These incentives bridge the gap between current practices and hard-to-quantify emission reductions. They could motivate participating companies and the government to expand climate-smart rice farming practices through the target region of Thai Binh Province in the Red River Delta. Scaling nationally, though, hinges on replicating this approach in Vietnam’s largest rice-producing area, the Mekong River Delta.


Farmers and AgResults project staff measure yields and adherence to climate-smart practices to test the efficacy of ‘packages’ proposed by private sector companies competing for prizes.

Potential for replicability. The project’s robust verification system makes it an appealing candidate for potential replication and expansion. Building on the project’s GHG verification system or using another approach such as the Sustainable Rice Platform, a relatively small prize fund in the Mekong Delta could spark a scale-up similar to what we are seeing in the Red River Delta. The political will exists; the Vietnamese government already supports scaling up climate-smart farming practices to help the country meet its Paris Agreement goal of agriculture-led GHG emissions reductions. However, without a market that monetizes carbon reductions, immediate economic benefits from improved practices may not be enough to overcome upscaling costs.

Creation of a carbon market. Although our project does not explicitly focus on creating a carbon market, its proven model for verifying reductions provides the technical clout to support an eventual carbon credit market for rice farming in Vietnam. The project uses similar verification methods to California’s carbon credit market for rice farming, although Vietnam’s thousands of small fields—a far cry from sprawling California farms—bring unique monitoring challenges. Armed with political will and the ability to track and verify data, however, a dedicated coalition of public and private stakeholders could pilot a carbon market for Vietnam. The additional income from selling carbon credits, on top of efficiency gains from reduced input costs and increased yields, could propel scale-up beyond the reach of any prize competition.

By combining short-term incentives with a replicable design, AgResults’ prize competition in Vietnam has laid out a potential roadmap for scaling climate-smart technologies. We were honored to contribute to the conversations at the CSA conference, and we welcome the chance to think through how similar initiatives could incentivize further private sector action through prize competitions.

AgResults is a $145 million initiative that uses Pay-for-Results prize competitions to incentivize the private sector to invest in high-impact agricultural innovations that help achieve reduced food insecurity, improved nutrition and health, and increased livestock productivity. The AgResults partnership is comprised of USAID, UKaid, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank Group, and the Governments of Australia and Canada.

Strategic Objective
Emissions, Climate Change Integration, Climate Finance, Economic Growth, Food Security and Agriculture, Climate-Smart Agriculture, Private Sector Engagement

Justin Kosoris headshot

Justin Kosoris provides consulting services to the AgResults Initiative, a multi-donor agricultural development fund that uses an innovative “Pay for Results” prize competition model to spur private sector engagement. He has worked in Cote d'Ivoire, Haiti, Mali, Rwanda, Senegal, and Vietnam to develop and implement solutions to difficult agricultural development and post-conflict challenges. Mr. Kosoris holds a Master’s degree in International Public Affairs from the LBJ School at the University of Texas-Austin, and a Bachelor’s degree in International Studies from Johns Hopkins University. He began his career as an agricultural extension agent with the United States Peace Corps in Senegal.

More on the Blog

When the Incan ruins of Machu Picchu were threatened by forest fires last September, firefighter Jessica Morón and her wildland firefighting team battled the flames to protect the historic sanctuary and its surrounding biodiversity.
Improving energy efficiency is an integral but often-overlooked part of low-emission development (LED) strategies that can help countries reach their climate targets while meeting growing demands for energy.
The United States and the world face a profound climate crisis. Climate change is not just a looming existential threat, it is currently threatening development progress and exacerbating global inequities; increasing humanitarian needs, food and water insecurity, and displacement; and contributing to conflict.